Why the Right Dispute-Resolution Process Matters

Florida law channels most community association disputes through a specific pre-suit process before litigation can begin — and using the wrong process, or skipping it altogether, can get a case dismissed regardless of its merits. Whether a dispute goes through mandatory mediation, DBPR arbitration, or straight to court depends on whether the community is a condominium or HOA and on the specific subject matter of the dispute.

Association Assessment Attorneys, P.A. represents associations and boards throughout Pinellas, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pasco, Lake, Orange, and Sarasota counties in mediation, arbitration, and litigation involving assessments, covenant enforcement, governance disputes, and contract matters.

HOA Pre-Suit Mediation Under F.S. 720.311

Before an HOA or a parcel owner can file most types of lawsuits against each other, Florida law requires pre-suit mediation.

F.S. 720.311(2)(a): Disputes between an association and a parcel owner regarding use of or changes to the parcel or common areas, and other specified disputes, must go through mediation before a demand for arbitration or a lawsuit is filed, with certain exceptions.

Common exemptions from the mandatory mediation requirement include actions to collect assessments or other amounts due, and matters requiring emergency or injunctive relief. Because the exemptions are narrow and fact-specific, it's important to confirm whether a given dispute is actually exempt before proceeding directly to litigation.

Condominium Dispute Resolution and DBPR Arbitration

Condominium disputes follow a partly different track. Many election and recall disputes must go through arbitration administered by the Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes (a division of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, or DBPR) before a party can go to court. Other types of condominium disputes may still be subject to mediation requirements depending on the specific subject matter, so identifying the correct forum at the outset avoids wasted time and cost.

When Litigation Is Necessary

Mediation and arbitration resolve many disputes, but litigation remains necessary when a party won't comply with a mediated agreement or arbitration result, when the dispute falls outside the mandatory pre-suit process (such as most collections actions), or when injunctive relief is needed on an urgent basis. We handle association litigation from initial pleadings through trial, and, where the governing documents or applicable statute allow for prevailing-party attorney's fees, factor fee-shifting into case strategy from the outset.

Common categories of association litigation include: covenant and use-restriction enforcement actions that couldn't be resolved through the fining process, breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against the board, declaratory-judgment actions to resolve ambiguous document language before a broader dispute develops, and construction-defect or vendor-related claims tied to capital improvement projects. Each of these carries different procedural requirements and different considerations around insurance coverage, since some claims may trigger a duty to defend under the association's general liability or D&O policy that should be tendered promptly once litigation appears likely.

Costs, Timelines, and Fee-Shifting

Mediation is typically faster and less expensive than litigation, often resolving within a single session and a matter of weeks from the initial demand. Arbitration timelines vary depending on DBPR's caseload and the complexity of the dispute, but generally still resolve faster than a full civil lawsuit. Litigation costs escalate quickly once discovery begins, which is one reason many governing documents and applicable statutes include prevailing-party attorney's fee provisions — a mechanism that can shift the financial calculus for both sides and often drives earlier settlement once the parties understand fee exposure is on the table.

Choosing the Right Forum From the Start

Filing in the wrong forum, or before completing a required pre-suit step, is one of the most common and most avoidable mistakes in association disputes. Before any demand letter goes out or any complaint gets filed, we confirm: whether the community is governed by Chapter 718 or Chapter 720, whether the specific dispute falls within a mandatory mediation or arbitration requirement or one of the narrow exemptions, and what the governing documents themselves say about dispute resolution, since some declarations impose additional internal-dispute procedures beyond the statutory minimum. Getting this analysis right at the outset avoids a dismissal or a forced restart months into a case.

Frequently Asked Questions

In most cases, yes. F.S. 720.311 requires pre-suit mediation for most HOA-owner disputes, with exceptions such as assessment collections. Skipping required mediation can get a case dismissed or delayed.
Yes. Many condo election and recall disputes go through DBPR arbitration rather than the HOA pre-suit mediation process, though other condo disputes may still require mediation depending on the subject matter.
F.S. 720.311 exempts certain matters, including actions to collect assessments and some emergency or injunctive relief situations. Exemptions are narrow, so confirm applicability before filing.
Varies by county and complexity; contested cases through trial can take a year or more, while many resolve earlier through mediation or motion practice. Uncontested collections and enforcement matters often move faster.
Often yes, through prevailing-party provisions in governing documents or fee-shifting statutes for specific claims like assessment collections, though recovery is never guaranteed and depends on the claim and outcome.